Press Freedom Under Scrutiny: Ethiopia Revokes Reuters Journalists’ Accreditation Ahead of AU Gathering
Edited by : Gezahegn Mekonnen Demissie -2/14/2026

The Ethiopian Media Authority has declined to renew the accreditation of three journalists working for Reuters in Addis Ababa, a decision that is drawing attention amid growing concerns over media access and transparency.

The move also included revoking Reuters’ special permit to cover the 39th Summit of the African Union, held in Ethiopia’s capital. The high-level summit brought together African heads of state, diplomats, and international policy leaders.

Officials have not released a formal explanation for the decision. However, reports indicate the action may be linked to a recent investigative article published by Reuters. The report alleged that Ethiopia had operated a secret training facility for fighters connected to Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces.

The Ethiopian government has strongly rejected the claims. Through its Ministry of Foreign Affairs, authorities stated that Ethiopia is not involved in Sudan’s ongoing conflict and denied any knowledge of the alleged training operation.

In response to the revocation, Reuters said it is reviewing the situation while reaffirming its commitment to independent and balanced reporting. The agency stated it will continue covering Ethiopia and regional developments in accordance with the Thomson Reuters Trust Principles, which guide the organization’s global journalistic standards.

Media analysts note the timing of the accreditation withdrawal is significant, as it occurred during one of Africa’s most prominent diplomatic gatherings. Press freedom advocates say limiting access for international journalists during such events may affect transparency and global confidence in information flow.

The development highlights broader tensions between national security concerns and independent journalism, an issue that continues to surface in several regions around the world. Observers say how governments manage media access during politically sensitive periods remains a key indicator of openness and democratic accountability.

test